I read an
article about video choking the Internet. One quote caught my attention and therefore my rage as well.
"But if the customer starts watching internet TV like the average household watches regular TV, 8 hours a day, BellSouth's cost would go up to $112 a month, according to Kafka."
Few things about this one:
1. That's far too many hours to watch TV. For any household.
2. What is this stat based on? Four person family? Shut-ins? TV store front windows?
3. Does that number include advertising?
4. Seriously, that's too much TV. It's an entire work-day of TV.
If it includes advertising, then they can reduce the proposed cost-per-hour of the pipleline as traditional models will have advertising pay for itself. If I'm watching streaming online content at "tv quality" resolution at hours at a time, it's also likely being piped in from the major studios.
Therefore, it's harder to pin this on stealing and piracy.
YouTube has a time-segment restriction. I imagine Google Video does too.
Higher resolution streams only come from the studios and networks. Everything else is either crunched into Flash, Quicktime, RealPlayer or Windows Media. Failing those, it's downloaded as a single file and thereby not streaming. But that's just nit-picking.
If someone is watching 8 hours of streaming content in Hi-res; they're idiots.
Use the device that's best suited for that: the TV itself.
How can we get the benefit of streaming online content, the user-based control that seems to draw people from traditional means? Unlock the TiVo or PVR. Start from there. The reasons people are jumping ship from a closed, mysterious cable box to their home PC are control, commercial-free, and content.
That and I can watch the entire first two seasons of Battlestar Galactica for free.